tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31522621.post1609487961553539132..comments2023-03-23T19:00:39.738+05:30Comments on sunlit: LOOKING BACK AT 6 CPC PENSIONS THROUGH THE OROP AND 7 CPC PRISMSunlithttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17431676884974625646noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31522621.post-78626990710424092312015-12-10T10:07:27.399+05:302015-12-10T10:07:27.399+05:30I think the comment by Col MS Raju is relevant onl...I think the comment by Col MS Raju is relevant only to recommendations of VII CPC. The last column in this blog post can serve to illustrate only the concept of how increments earned should not be confused with years of service. The table here can mislead readers into thinking OROP from January 2006 is the issue in this case for increment related pensions, about which there has been a lot of email floating around, for all those who retired before 1st January 2006. That case to my mind is about fixing pensions from Jan 06 based on increments actually earned and not on minimum of pay in fitment table for rank in pay-band.<br /><br />For the case, or the planned case, for revising pensions from 01 Jan 2006, the number of increments actually earned before 31 Dec 2005 seem to be relevant.<br /><br />The table in this blog post also shows how two increments earned by someone retiring before 31 Dec 2005 amounted to only half the number of corresponding increments for period from 01 Jan 2006. The same would apply after 01 Jan 2016 for those who had retired before 31 Dec 2005. So it is unclear how pensions could be based on increments actually earned and under OROP taken together.<br /><br />I have already indicated on my blog how VII CPC pensions need to be governed for OROP keeping in mind "the years of service" consideration over and above the increments earned. <a href="goo.gl/J5guDN" rel="nofollow"><b> <br />goo.gl/J5guDN</b></a>corona8https://www.blogger.com/profile/14443791458911191943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31522621.post-39854913492280804812015-12-09T09:18:36.775+05:302015-12-09T09:18:36.775+05:30Dear Sir,
With the introduction of time bound ran...Dear Sir,<br /><br />With the introduction of time bound rank of Lt Col wef 24 Dec 2004, all earlier Lt Cols would start earning increments from 14th year onwards (This is what the entitlement). If a Lt col (whether SG or TS) retires at 21 years, his entitlement for increments is 8 increments either it is in 5th, 6th or 7th CPC. For him add 8 increments to the min of the pay in slab-pay bands then only it would amount to OROP. In this system only a Lt Col retired earlier would draw pension with the Lt Col retiring today with same length of service.<br /><br />But my question is if a Lt Col served for 33 years in 5th CPC (where no time scale Col rank was there) then what would be his pay/pension? Will he get 20 increments (33-13)if not then why the govt keeping officers beyond permissible increments why not they being superannuated instead of stagnating at some year say 26th year to 33 years. Since the Govt has used the services of the officer till 33 years and beyond the govt has no reason to justify in keeping the officer in service without increments.Col MS Rajuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04599746784421605313noreply@blogger.com