tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31522621.post7903756399155004499..comments2023-03-23T19:00:39.738+05:30Comments on sunlit: Another Bonanza For Pre-Mature RetireesSunlithttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17431676884974625646noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31522621.post-9050415621104733122016-05-18T19:27:03.959+05:302016-05-18T19:27:03.959+05:30Pse do add to ibid comment.
About so called sel gr...Pse do add to ibid comment.<br />About so called sel gr Lt Col after 1986 with revision of lowest sel gr rank of unit commamder to Col from 1984 onwards ; was simply equivalent of Maj rank prior to 1986. As per that SAI 1987 after 4 CPC ,the rank of selection grade Lt Col was abolished .Therefore it was superficial ,artificial and a myth .This rank of Lt Col sel gr after 1984 is not equivalent to Lt Col sel gr or Lt Col time scale of 24 yrs Svc prior to 1984.<br />In 1984 promotiom to Lt Col ts was reduced to 21 from 24 - naturally in consonance with revised lowest selection gr rank of unit command to Col.<br />Thus Lt Col SG stands abolished from 1986.In that transition processes,Lt Col promotion after 1986 ,should have been after13 yrs of service as that of Maj after 13 yrs prior to 1986.<br />This envisaged change ,instead of implementing soon after 1986 ,was delayed and dragged on till 2004 by giving a name to a committee called AVS.<br />On study of facts ,records and analysis ,AVS com proceedings are simply a formality of much delayed change of 4cpc of integrated pay scale with separate rankconcept.nd related rank concept.<br /> Records of mod and services hq have these facts..This is where I said about that irrivalence and substitution of min for ranks of Col & Brig in the integrated scales for all from 2/Lt to Brig.<br />That was faux pas of rank pay saga corrected by Danapalan.That denial of due rank pay to officers below Lt Col was deliberate to lower pays of officers of Lt Col and below.<br />All these historical facts are relavent when we see these ,% increases to Lt Col and Maj rk.<br /> Anomalies would remain unresolved ,if facts truth and related factors are disregarded.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />balahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08915831413555890997noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31522621.post-68180354310303805932016-05-16T20:38:13.953+05:302016-05-16T20:38:13.953+05:30This 50% at 20 yrs is simple logic of parity &...This 50% at 20 yrs is simple logic of parity & equality.This is base and basis.since these legitimate were denied by wrong presumptions and administrative / bureaucratic arbitrary decisions ,since restored by judiciary - duly adjudicated after hearing all facts & arguments;we should now think of those wrong fixation of pensions beyond 20 yrs.<br />Naturally ,those have to be revised with the bench mark of this revision , rather correction.<br />These % age increases are higher to some ,since they were earlier denied by large amounts at higher % .<br />Interesting point of concern - all these corrections and reliefs have come about due to initiatives by some individual efforts like Danapalan ,Inasu ,.....etc and some central govt employees associations ;none from fauji GPS /asso.<br />We should look upon a rank at 20 yrs service by adequately factoring of changes from 1984 to 2004 and beyond.these cut off dates and committes(AVS)have to be interpreted and applied with due deligence..Flexibility.No rigidity.As I stated before this AVS was only delayed formalisation of changes/revisions post 1986 with change of lowest sel gr rk to Col.That so called sel gr Lt Col after 1986 was superficial and time scale Lt Col at 13 yrs svc should have been in 1986 .rather delayed till 2004.<br />Mind set of rank rigidity has been genesis of all these unresolved anomalies.The differentiation of ranks of 2/Lt to Colonel by some cut off dates is not tenable.Fundamental factor of years of service with MACP and NFU cannot be ignored .ultimately the difference between ranks would be only in terms of number of increments ,limited to 2 to 4.<br />This lengthy expression of facts as comment is for awareness of veterans .I consider u blog has intellectual presentations and therefore this lengthy comment.balahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08915831413555890997noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31522621.post-72380660206089228972016-04-30T19:26:34.460+05:302016-04-30T19:26:34.460+05:30If a Major with 20 years service (15447) gets upgr...If a Major with 20 years service (15447) gets upgraded pension of a Lt Col (TS) (33 years QS) (26265), then he will be getting 70% improvement. That will be the highest of the pre 2006 lot. But the story ends there with this huge arrears and will get degraded again in the 7CPC increment based matrix.Manoharhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04398056746166406979noreply@blogger.com